Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748538›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025

Current Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic modeling in New Medicinal Product Approvals at EMA.

Polly Paul, Pieter J Colin, Flora Musuamba Tshinanu, Carolien Versantvoort, Efthymios Manolis, Kevin Blake

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Best Practices in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Scoping review of the role of pharmacometrics in model-informed drug development.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Polly PaulEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter J ColinEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Flora Musuamba TshinanuFederal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8276-8870
Carolien VersantvoortDutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Efthymios ManolisEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kevin BlakeEuropean Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Models are routinely used in drug development and therefore appear frequently in marketing authorization applications (MAAs) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA). For a model to be a key source of evidence for a regulatory decision, it must be considered qualified for the intended use. Advice on the data expected to allow qualification of a PBPK model or platform is provided in the EMA Guideline on the reporting of PBPK modeling and simulation. The present study is an EMA review of the use of PBPK models in submitted MAAs in 2022 and 2023 focussing on the concept of qualification and the reasons why models were not considered qualified. A review of the 95 MAAs with a "full" legal basis approved during these years showed that 25 of them contained PBPK modeling. There were 65 proposed general areas of intended use for PBPK modeling identified across the applications, with the most common being a prediction of drug-drug interactions with enzymes or transporters (69%). Finally, this review showed that most of the models submitted in applications to EMA were not considered qualified for the intended use(s). The reasons identified for this are reported and the need for further EMA guidance, particularly around requirements for qualification of PBPK models, are discussed.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentModels, BiologicalPharmacokineticsComputer SimulationDrug InteractionsEuropeEuropean UnionHumans

Identifiers

PMID39748538
PMCPMC11835421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.