Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748493›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of geriatric medicine and research2024

Unraveling the Impact of Destabilizing Shoes on Balance Control and Fall Prevention in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

In-Ju Kim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of geriatric medicine and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

In-Ju KimDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, College of Engineering, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

University of Sharjah 2102040551172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls pose a significant risk to older adults, often leading to severe injury and disability. One potential contributing factor to falls is footwear, particularly shoes with destabilizing features. This systematic review assessed the effects of destabilizing shoes on stability control and fall prevention in older adults, highlighting their effectiveness in balance control and fall prevention, and the detailing the specific review methodology.

methodsWe thoroughly searched relevant databases and meticulously screened the identified studies based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then extracted data from 30 eligible studies with various study designs and shoe types and synthesized this information to assess the impact of destabilizing shoes on balance and gait measures, fall incidence, and other relevant outcomes.

resultsWhile certain types of destabilizing shoes may improve specific aspects of balance and proprioception, they can also adversely affect steadiness control and potentially increase the risk of falls if not appropriately used. Therefore, the use of destabilizing shoes should be carefully considered and tailored to individual needs, with proper guidance and training to minimize fall risk.

conclusionThe findings of this review significantly inform footwear design and selection in older adults and emphasize the need for additional research. By synthesizing the available evidence, this review highlights the potential benefits and risks associated with destabilizing shoes and suggests the need for careful evaluation of their use on a case-by-case basis. This review serves as a basis for future guidelines on the use of destabilizing shoes in older adults with the aim of developing effective fall prevention interventions.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsPostural BalanceShoesAgedEquipment DesignGaitHumansBalance controlDestabilizing shoesFall preventionOlder adultsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39748493
PMCPMC11695762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.