Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748433›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Assessment of older persons with multimorbidity in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences and preferences in fostering continuity of care.

Turid Rimereit Aarønes, Kristin Taraldsen, Linda Aimée Hartford Kvæl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Relying on Trust: A Qualitative Study on Home-Dwelling Older Adults' Experiences and Preferences With Multimorbidity Management in Municipal Healthcare Assessments.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Turid Rimereit AarønesFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. turidrim@oslomet.no.
Kristin TaraldsenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Linda Aimée Hartford KvælFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the population ages, more people live longer with multimorbidity. Older people with multimorbidity face diverse needs and medical conditions, increasing the risk of adverse health outcomes, and often experience fragmented healthcare. Research has called for better ways to reach, understand and care for this group to enhance care continuity. This study aimed to examine healthcare professionals' experiences and preferences as they relate to assessments' role in promoting care continuity for home-dwelling older patients with multimorbidity in community-based healthcare.

methodsThis qualitative study acquired qualitative data from 17 healthcare professionals from reablement teams, interdisciplinary teams, rehabilitation teams and home nursing in three Norwegian municipalities. Representing nursing, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and social work, all participants were experienced in assessing older home-dwelling patients with multimorbidity. Semi-structured focus group and individual interviews were conducted, then the interviews were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe analysis elicited three themes: gaining insight beyond diagnoses to promote relational continuity, facilitating interaction to ensure informational continuity, and linking patient journeys to facilitate managerial continuity. The themes underscore the significance of evaluating patients beyond their medical conditions, emphasising assessment's collaborative nature across disciplines. Healthcare professionals use diverse assessment methods and facilitate interaction to understand patients' needs. Working together across different healthcare professions is key for care that includes the whole patient, but challenges such as underutilisation of assessments and poor documentation still exist. Furthermore, linking patient journeys remains difficult due to fragmented services and limited resources. Despite these challenges, assessments were viewed as crucial to care continuity.

conclusionsIn this qualitative study, healthcare professionals emphasised that assessment is a complex, continuous process due to the fluctuating health of individuals with multimorbidity. Effective instruments and diverse assessment methods are essential to understanding all aspects of patients' health and well-being to ensure care continuity across individual, service, and system levels. Our findings highlight the need for systematic and structured use of assessments to improve interdisciplinary collaboration and personalised care for older individuals with multimorbidity. Understanding the patient journey is crucial for achieving these goals, potentially benefiting healthcare professionals, policymakers, and primary care providers.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareMultimorbidityPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNorwayAssessmentCare continuityHolistic understandingInterdisciplinary collaborationMultimorbidityPerson-centred carePrimary careProfessional communication

Identifiers

PMID39748433
PMCPMC11694464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.