ArticleBMC health services research2025
Health differences between rural and non-rural Texas counties based on 2023 County Health Rankings.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of rural residence on clinical outcomes in SLE: a systematic review.Lupus science & medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Regional and statewide hysterectomy-corrected endometrial cancer incidence and five-year relative survival in Texas.Cancer epidemiology · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Multi-Institution, Collaborative Community Psychiatry Rotation: A Novel Pipeline Strategy for Enhancing the Public Psychiatry Workforce.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026Article
- Rural-Urban Differences in Hypertension Prevalence and Control in a Large Regional Health System Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Six-Year Population-Based Retrospective Analysis.Research square · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impact of the 2nd Annual West Texas Health Disparities Symposium: a comprehensive survey analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The new Rural Emergency Hospital Designation Program: Will it improve access to care for rural Americans?The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025Article
- Profiles of Non-medical Drivers and Health Burden Associated With Care Seeking Among Rural Women.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlace matters for health. In Texas, growing rural populations face a variety of structural, social, and economic disparities that position them for potentially worse health outcomes. The current study contributes to understanding rural health disparities in a state-specific context.
methodsUsing 2023 County Health Rankings data from the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, the study analyzes rural/non-rural county differences in Texas across six composite indexed domains of health outcomes (length of life, quality of life) and health factors (health behavior, clinical care, socioeconomic factors, physical environment) with a chi-square test of significance and logistic regression.
resultsQuartile ranking distributions of the six domains differed between rural and non-rural counties. Rural Texas counties were significantly more likely to fall into the bottom quartile(s) in the domains of length of life and clinical care and less likely to fall into the bottom quartile(s) in the domains of quality of life and physical environment. No differences were found in the domains of health behavior and socioeconomic factors. Findings regarding disparities in length of life and clinical care align with other studies examining disease prevalence and the unavailability of many health services in rural Texas. The lack of significant differences in other domains may relate to indicators that are not present in the dataset, given studies that find disparities relating to other underlying factors.
conclusionsTexas County Health Rankings data show differences in health outcomes and factors between rural and non-rural counties. Limitations of findings relate to the study's cross-sectional design and parameters of the secondary data source. Ultimately, results can help state health stakeholders, especially those in community or operational contexts with limited resources or access to more detailed health statistics, to use the CHR dataset to consider more relevant local interventions to address rural health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.