ArticleBMC global and public health2025
Criminal legal penalties, substance use, and overdose: a concept mapping study examining Colorado's criminal legal penalties.
Article in BMC global and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn the USA, many states, including Colorado, have increased criminal penalties for illicit opioid possession, which may alter overdose risk. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between Colorado's increased drug-related criminal legal penalties, risk of overdose, and substance use patterns.
methodsWe used concept mapping - a mixed-methods approach used to develop a conceptual understanding of an issue from a community lens - to engage with people with living and/or lived experience with the criminal legal system, substance use, and/or overdose, their loved ones, and service providers. In facilitated discussion, we used the prompt: "Do you see overdose and substance use, in Colorado, being impacted by an individual's involvement with the criminal legal system?" Participants - recruited from community-based organizations - identified, rated, sorted, and categorized factors affecting criminal legal involvement, substance use, and/or overdose in their community. We used groupwisdom to develop concept maps and to analyze findings.
resultsTwenty-four individuals (ages 18-70) participated; most had living and/or lived experience. Participants identified 100 distinct factors, which were sorted into 9 clusters: societal impacts of criminal legal involvement, lifesaving benefits to decreased criminal legal penalties, environmental barriers of criminal legal involvement, structural barriers to recovery services, essential culturally aware community-based services, strategic allocation of funding, strategies to improve law enforcement's impact, changing policies to keep law enforcement accountable and better educate law enforcement on community culture, and community issues with law enforcement to prioritize. Of the 40 most influential and common factors, most related to structural impacts of criminal legal involvement and barriers to recovery (e.g., long waitlists, job loss).
conclusionsUsing concept mapping, we worked with community members to identify and prioritize factors associated with substance use and overdose amidst increasing drug-related criminal legal penalties. These insights (e.g., law enforcement's role should be acting as a bridge to mental health and recovery services) are critical for policymakers and service providers, as they speak to the need for investing in re-entry services, harm reduction services, and co-responder models for behavioral health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.