ArticleCardiovascular ultrasound2025
Right ventricular myocardial work: proof-of-concept for the assessment of pressure-strain loops of patients with pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension.
Article in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Right Ventricular Myocardial Work by Echocardiography: A Scoping Review of Methodology, Validation, and Clinical Applications.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Right ventricular global constructive work as an echocardiographic predictor of worsening heart failure.European heart journal open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRight ventricular myocardial work (RVMW) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography allows to study the right ventricular (RV) function using RV pressure-strain loops. The assessment of these novel indexes of RVMW has not yet been exten sively studied, namely in pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) population.
objectivesto evaluate the relationship between RVMW and invasive indices of right heart catheterization (RHC) in a cohort of patients with group I and group IV PH and to compare with a control group without PH.
methodsA prospective registry of pre-capillary PH patients was used and compared with a control group without PH. In both groups, patients underwent same day RHC and echocardiographic assessment. Dedicated software for left ventricle myocardial work was used for the RV. RV global work index (RVGWI) was calculated as the area of the RV pressure-strain loops. From RVGWI, RV global constructive work (RVGCW), RV global wasted work (RVGWW), and RV global work efficiency (RVGWE) were estimated.
results25 pts were included: 17 pts with PH were compared with 8 pts without PH. RVGWI, RVGCW and RVGWW were significantly higher in PH patients than in controls (p < 0,05), while RVGWE was significantly lower (p < 0,05). Significant correlations were found between mean pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index, venous oxygen saturation, NT-proBNP and RVGCW, RVGWW and RVGWE; between pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac output, right ventricular stroke work and RVGWI, RVGCW, RVGWW and RVGWE; between stroke volume and RVGWW and RVGWE; between pulmonary artery pulsatility index and RVGWI, RVGCW and RVGWW; between RA pressure and RVGWE.
conclusionsPatients with pre-capillary PH present significantly higher RVGWI, RVGCW and RVGWW and lower RVGWE than patients without PH. Echocardiographic RVMW-derived indexes show significant correlation with invasive measurements and NT-proBNP. Larger studies are needed to assess the prognostic value of these novel indexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.