Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748369›Full record

ArticleBMC chemistry2025

A computational approach to drug design for multiple sclerosis via QSPR modeling, chemical graph theory, and multi-criteria decision analysis.

Fozia Bashir Farooq, Nazeran Idrees, Esha Noor, Nouf Abdulrahman Alqahtani, Muhammad Imran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive modelling and ranking:Frontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fozia Bashir FarooqDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Nazeran IdreesDepartment of Mathematics, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan. nazeranjawwad@gmail.com.
Esha NoorDepartment of Mathematics, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Nouf Abdulrahman AlqahtaniDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, 11564, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad ImranDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University, Al Khobar, 31952, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex autoimmune disease of the central nervous system with an unknown etiology. While disease-modifying therapies can slow progression, there is a need for more effective treatments. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling using topological indices derived from chemical graph theory is a promising approach to rationally design new drugs for MS. Using a linear regression approach, we create models for Quantitative Structure-Property Relations (QSPR), detecting correlations between properties such as enthalpy of vaporization, flash point, molar weight, polarizability, molar volume, and complexity with certain degree related topological indices. We used a dataset related to drugs for MS with known properties for training the model and also for validation. To prioritize the most promising drug candidates, we used multi-criteria decision making based on the predicted properties and topological indices, allowing for more informed decisions. The 12 drug candidates were prioritized using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and two Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) methods. The rankings obtained using TOPSIS, WASPAS methods showed a high level of agreement among the results. This framework can be broadly applied to rationally design new therapeutics for complex diseases.

Indexed as

Chemical graphsCorrelationDecision-makingTopological index

Identifiers

PMID39748369
PMCPMC11697749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.