ArticleBMC medical education2025
Effect of narrative writing based on Gibbs' reflective model on the empathy and communication skills of nursing students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a Reflection-Integrated CICARE Program on Empathy and Clinical Judgment in Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Reflective writing in general practice residency: perceived usefulness of complex and authentic situation reports in France.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Structured reflective sessions enhance knowledge and clinical skills in operating room technology students: a Solomon four-group study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Self-reflection and empathy in undergraduate nursing students: a network analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Integrating Lived Experience in Preprofessional Training in Speech Pathology and Audiology.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Nursing Students' Perceptions of Clinical Debriefing TALK©: A Qualitative Case Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the essential skills required in nursing students is empathetic communication and communication skills. Communication skills refer to a set of potential and actual abilities that help achieve acceptable and informative behavior, leading to a level of emotional connection. This interpersonal skill facilitates the establishment and strengthening of the nurse-patient relationship. Therefore, researchers aimed to conduct a study to determine the impact of narrative writing based on Gibbs' reflective model on the empathy and communication skills of nursing students.
methodsThis quasi-experimental research was conducted using two groups and before-after design. The statistical population consisted of all third and fourth-year nursing students at Zabol University of Medical Sciences in 2023, among whom 80 students were selected by the census. The data collection tools included a demographic information form and reliable and valid questionnaires for empathy and communication skills. In the intervention group, Gibbs' reflective thinking was taught through workshops. Students in this group were asked to engage in narrative writing-reflection sessions for 8 weeks, producing at least 8 narratives (one at the end of each week). The empathy and communication skills questionnaires were completed again at the end of the 8th week. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22), applying descriptive statistics and inferential statistics at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval.
resultsThe results of this study indicate that narrative writing based on Gibbs' reflective model can positively impact nursing students' empathy and communication skills. Specifically, the mean empathy score in the intervention group increased from 63.35 ± 6.61 to 70.20 ± 10.43, which was statistically significant according to the paired t-test (P = 0.000). In contrast, the control group showed no significant change in empathy, with scores changing from 62.70 ± 8.20 to 62.72 ± 7.92 (P = 0.760). Similarly, the mean communication skill in the intervention group improved from 183 ± 16.15 to 211.75 ± 9.30, with this change also being statistically significant (P = 0.000). In the control group, communication skills changed minimally from 186.27 ± 16.07 to 187.60 ± 15.44, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.215). Furthermore, when comparing the changes in empathy and communication skill scores according to demographic and educational variables, no significant differences were found (P > 0.05).
conclusionsNarrative writing helps students establish a more appropriate relationship with patients by fostering a deeper understanding of their issues and enhancing their empathy, leading to better patient care during their treatment. This suggests that incorporating narrative writing into nursing education could be beneficial for developing essential skills in future healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.