ArticleBMC oral health2025
Evaluatıon of stress dıstrıbutıon by applıed dıfferent forces on ımmature maxıllary central teeth wıth dıfferent treatment optıons: a laboratory fınıte element stress analysıs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of postoperative mechanical behavior of immature premolars: apexification vs regeneration.Odontology · 2026Article
- Fracture resistance of regenerated immature teeth in different simulated stages of root development: an in vitro cyclic loading study.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
- The effect of residual root length and different root canal filling materials on biomechanical stress distribution following apical resection: a finite element analysis study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmature maxillary central teeth can be managed by using several treatment options. The aim of this finite element stress analysis study was to evaluate the effect of different treatment procedures on the stresses on immature maxillary incisor teeth models that generated on cone beam computed tomography, by trauma and bite forces.
methodsA total of 11 different models consisting of revascularization treatment using MTA and biodentine and the state of the root apex formed with cement after treatment, apexification, modified apexification, traditional root canal treatment and two different control groups have been created. 300N traumatic force and 240N bite force was applied with 90 and 130 angles. The stress values were examined in apical, middle and coronal sections using the finite element stress analysis method.
resultsThe highest stress density was observed in the coronal root section in all models except for modified apexification treatment. While the highest vonMises stress value in coronal root dentin was found in the traditional root canal treatment group, the lowest value was found in the mature control group. In the modified apexification treatment groups, the stress was intensified in the middle and apical root section. It has been observed that in the models in which MTA is used, less stress occurs in all root parts compared to the models in which biodentine is used.
conclusionsThe use of MTA in immature teeth makes it more resistant to fracture compared to biodentine. Modified apexification method can reduce stress in the cervical area. More studies are needed on this subject.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.