Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748331›Full record

ReviewThe journal of headache and pain2025

Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members' vision - part 2.

Igor Petrušić, Chia-Chun Chiang, David Garcia-Azorin, Woo-Seok Ha, Raffaele Ornello, Lanfranco Pellesi, Eloisa Rubio-Beltrán, Ruth Ruscheweyh, Marta Waliszewska-Prosół, William Wells-Gatnik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Igor PetrušićLaboratory for Advanced Analysis of Neuroimages, Faculty of Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. ip7med@yahoo.com.
Chia-Chun ChiangDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David Garcia-AzorinDepartment of Medicine, Toxicology and Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Woo-Seok HaDepartment of Neurology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Raffaele OrnelloDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Lanfranco PellesiClinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Eloisa Rubio-BeltránHeadache Group. Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Ruth RuscheweyhDepartment of Neurology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marta Waliszewska-ProsółDepartment of Neurology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
William Wells-GatnikUnitelma Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Part 2 explores the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in addressing the complexities of headache disorders through innovative approaches, including digital twin models, wearable healthcare technologies and biosensors, and AI-driven drug discovery. Digital twins, as dynamic digital representations of patients, offer opportunities for personalized headache management by integrating diverse datasets such as neuroimaging, multiomics, and wearable sensor data to advance headache research, optimize treatment, and enable virtual trials. In addition, AI-driven wearable devices equipped with next-generation biosensors combined with multi-agent chatbots could enable real-time physiological and biochemical monitoring, diagnosing, facilitating early headache attack forecasting and prevention, disease tracking, and personalized interventions. Furthermore, AI-driven advances in drug discovery leverage machine learning and generative AI to accelerate the identification of novel therapeutic targets and optimize treatment strategies for migraine and other headache disorders. Despite these advances, challenges such as data standardization, model explainability, and ethical considerations remain pivotal. Collaborative efforts between clinicians, biomedical and biotechnological engineers, AI scientists, legal representatives and bioethics experts are essential to overcoming these barriers and unlocking AI's full potential in transforming headache research and healthcare. This is a call to action in proposing novel frameworks for integrating AI-based technologies into headache care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBiomedical ResearchHeadacheHumansWearable Electronic DevicesBiosensorsChatbotDigital twinDrug discoveryMachine learningMigraineWearable devices

Identifiers

PMID39748331
PMCPMC11697626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.