Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748312›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2025

Reduction of pain and functional disability over time in patients treated with zavegepant: a post-hoc analysis of the BHV3500-301 phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

Lauren Powell, Fiona O'Sullivan, Pramoda Jayasinghe, Basia Rogula, Feng Dai, Jessica Cirillo, Samantha Sweeney, Lucy Abraham, Jessica Ailani

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04571060 (Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Safety and Efficacy Trial of BHV-3500), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04571060 phase3completednot on this map

Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Safety and Efficacy Trial of BHV-3500 (Zavegepant) Intranasal for the Acute Treatment of Migraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1,978ConditionsMigraineArmsZavegepant, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lauren PowellBroadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Fiona O'SullivanBroadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Pramoda JayasingheBroadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Basia RogulaBroadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Feng DaiPfizer Inc, NYC, USA.
Jessica CirilloPfizer Inc, NYC, USA. jessica.cirillo@pfizer.com.
Samantha SweeneyPfizer Inc, NYC, USA.
Lucy AbrahamPfizer R&D UK Ltd., Tadworth, Surrey, UK.
Jessica AilaniDepartment of Neurology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMigraine is a disabling disorder that impacts 40 million people in the US. Zavegepant is the first calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist nasal-spray approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the proportion of patients in various pain and functional disability states over 48-h, for patients treated with zavegepant 10 mg nasal-spray versus placebo.

methodsThis post-hoc analysis included adult patients with > 1-year history of migraine from BHV3500-301 (NCT04571060): a phase 3 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-attack study. Over 48-h, pain severity and functional disability were captured at various timepoints (pre- and post-dosing). The proportion of patients at each pain severity or functional disability state and the time spent in each category was calculated. These were analyzed for patients with complete timepoint data available and using missing not at random (MNAR) imputation for missing timepoints. Predictors of functional disability were assessed using a mixed-effects logistic regression model.

resultsThere were 1,269 patients included in the MNAR imputation analysis, and between 630-641 in the complete-case analysis. As early as 15-min post-dose, a larger proportion of zavegepant patients achieved no/mild pain compared to placebo, despite balanced migraine severity pre-dose. Furthermore, zavegepant patients spent significantly more time (over 2.5-h) in pain freedom compared to placebo. Similarly, a higher proportion of patients with normal function was observed with zavegepant vs placebo, as early as 30-min post-dose. Over 48-h, patients treated with zavegepant spent an average of ~ 3-h longer with normal functioning compared to placebo. Results were similar when analyzing both analytic groups. In a regression model, treatment with zavegepant, lower pain severity, fewer baseline monthly migraine days, and absence of photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea were associated with better functioning (p < 0.05) over 48-h.

conclusionThis post-hoc analysis demonstrates the benefit of zavegepant nasal spray over placebo on two patient-centric endpoints: time spent with pain freedom and normal functioning over 48-h post-dose. These data support the use of zavegepant for providing rapid and sustained freedom from migraine pain and freedom from migraine related disability, particularly for those who would benefit from the nasal CGRP formulation.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersAdministration, IntranasalAdultCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsCalcitonin gene-related peptideFunctional disabilityMigrainePainRandomized controlled trialTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID39748312
PMCPMC11696797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.