Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748279›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Application and implementation of brief geriatric assessment in primary care and community settings: a scoping review.

Lay Khoon Lau, Penny Lun, Jonathan Gao, Edward Tan, Yew Yoong Ding

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. FI-CGA and eFI-CGA in Frailty Care: a Scoping Review.Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lay Khoon LauGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), 2 Yishun Central 2, Singapore, 768024, Singapore. lau.charlene.lk@geri.com.sg.
Penny LunGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), 2 Yishun Central 2, Singapore, 768024, Singapore.
Jonathan GaoGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), 2 Yishun Central 2, Singapore, 768024, Singapore.
Edward TanGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), 2 Yishun Central 2, Singapore, 768024, Singapore.
Yew Yoong DingGeriatric Education and Research Institute (GERI), 2 Yishun Central 2, Singapore, 768024, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComprehensive Geriatric Assessment is the gold standard of clinical care for older patients but its application in the primary care setting is limited, possibly due to its time-consuming process. Hence, a brief geriatric assessment could be a feasible alternative. We conducted a scoping review to identify which brief geriatric assessment tools have been evaluated or implemented in primary and community care settings and to identify the domains assessed including their reported outcomes.

methodsCENTRAL, PubMed and Embase were searched using specific text words and MeSH for articles published from inception that studied evaluation or implementation of brief geriatric assessments in primary care or community setting.

resultsTwenty-five articles were included in the review, of which 11 described brief geriatric assessments implemented in community, nine in primary care and five in mixed settings. Physical health, functional, mobility/balance and psychological/mental emerged as four domains that are most assessed in brief geriatric assessments. Self-reported questionnaire is the key approach, but uncertainty remains on the validity of subjective cognitive assessments. Brief geriatric assessments have been administered by non-healthcare professionals. The duration taken to complete ranged from five to 20 min. Studies did not report significant change in the clinical outcomes of older adults except for better identification of those with higher needs.

conclusionThe studies reported that brief geriatric assessments could identify older adults with unmet needs or geriatric syndromes, but they did not report improved health outcomes when combined with clinical intervention pathways. Clarity of brief geriatric assessments' questions is important to ensure the feasibility of using self-administered questionnaire by older adults. Future studies should determine which groups of older adults benefit the most from the brief assessments when these are paired with additional evaluations and interventions.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentPrimary Health CareAgedCommunity Health ServicesHumansBrief geriatric assessmentCommunity settingPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID39748279
PMCPMC11697857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.