ArticleScientific reports2025
Logical reasoning for human activity recognition based on multisource data from wearable device.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementing ensemble of deep learning model with optimization techniques for human activity recognition to assist individuals with disabilities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intelligent routing for human activity recognition in wireless body area networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart wearable devices detection and recording of people's everyday activities is critical for health monitoring, helping persons with disabilities, and providing care for the elderly. Most of the research that is being conducted uses a machine learning-based methodology; however, these approaches frequently have issues with high computing resource consumption, burdensome training data gathering, and restricted scalability across many contexts. This research suggests a behaviour detection technology based on multi-source sensing and logical reasoning to address these problems. In order to realize the natural fusion of signal processing and logical reasoning in behavior recognition research, this work designs a lightweight behavior recognition solution using the pertinent theories of ontology reasoning in classical artificial intelligence. Machine learning technology is also employed for behavior recognition using the same data set. Once the best model has been chosen, the cross-person recognition results after testing and modification of parameters are 90.8% and 92.1%, respectively. This technology was used to create a behaviour recognition system, and several tests were run to assess how well it worked. The findings demonstrate that the suggested strategy achieves over 90% recognition accuracy for 11 different daily activities, including jogging, walking, and stair climbing. Additionally, the suggested strategy dramatically minimises the quantity of user-provided training data needed in comparison to machine learning-based behaviour identification techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.