Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Irregular seeds DEM parameters prediction based on 3D point cloud and GA-BP-GA optimization.

Yuling Shao, Qing Wang, Hao Sun, Xinting Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuling ShaoCollege of Engineering, Shandong Yingcai University, Jinan, 250104, China.
Qing WangCollege of Engineering, Shandong Yingcai University, Jinan, 250104, China.
Hao SunWeihai Mangosteen Model Co., Ltd., Weihai, 264499, China.
Xinting DingCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China. dingxinting@nwafu.edu.cn.

Funding

Shandong Yingcai University Applied Technology Research Program YCKY24110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the small and irregular shapes of vegetable seeds, modeling them is challenging, and the imprecision of physical parameters hinders the performance of vegetable seeders, impeding simulation development. In this study, seeds of cucumber, pepper, and tomato were seen as examples. A 3D point cloud reconstruction method based on Structure-from-Motion Multi-View Stereo (SfM-MVS) was employed to accurately extract 3D models of small and irregularly shaped seeds. Corresponding discrete element models were established. Combining physical and simulation experiments on seed angle of repose(AOR), significant parameters influencing seed AOR and their ranges were identified through Plackett-Burman Design (PBD) and steepest ascent test. Within this range, the GA-BP-GA algorithm was used to accurately inverse the optimal parameter combination. The results indicate that the SfM-MVS 3D point cloud reconstruction method can extract more detailed shape information of small and irregularly shaped seeds. The GA-BP-GA algorithm achieved an inversion of physical parameters with the smallest relative error of cucumber, pepper, and tomato seeds being 0.26%, 0.98%, and 0.51%, respectively. Through experimental comparative analysis, the feasibility and accuracy of this method in calibrating discrete element parameters for small and irregularly shaped seeds were validated. The established seed models and calibrated parameters in this study can be implemented to the simulation optimization design of vegetable seeders, enhancing development efficiency and operational performance.

Indexed as

3D point cloud reconstructionDiscrete element methodGA-BP neural networkSeeds with irregular shapeSfM-MVS

Identifiers

PMID39748089
PMCPMC11695837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.