ArticleScientific reports2025
Orthogonal validation of PROTAC mediated degradation of the integral membrane proteins EGFR and c-MET.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dysregulation of integral membrane proteins (IMPs) has been linked to a myriad of diseases, making these proteins an attractive target in drug research. Whilst PROTAC technology has had a significant impact in scientific research, its application to IMPs is still limited. Limitations of the traditional approach of immunoblotting in PROTAC research include the low throughput compared to other methods, as well as a lack of spatial information for the target. Here we compare orthogonal antibody based approaches, i.e. immunoblotting, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence, to measure PROTAC mediated degradation of two established, endogenous targets, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth-factor receptor (c-MET). We discuss advantages and limitations of each methodology for the assessment of PROTAC efficacy on IMPs. Overall, we recommend the use of immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, for an increased accuracy with both a qualitative and quantitative insight into degradation efficacy and a critical distinction between cell membrane-localized and intracellular IMP protein pools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.