Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748066›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Orthogonal validation of PROTAC mediated degradation of the integral membrane proteins EGFR and c-MET.

Camilla Ruffilli, Sascha Röth, Noam Zelcer, Kevin Moreau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camilla Ruffilli *Safety Innovation and PROTAC Safety, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7501-3744
Sascha Röth *Safety Innovation and PROTAC Safety, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7273-6701
Noam ZelcerDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1000 GG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6935-7532
Kevin MoreauSafety Innovation and PROTAC Safety, Clinical Pharmacology & Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CB2 0SL, UK. kevin.moreau@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3688-3998

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation 953489
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of integral membrane proteins (IMPs) has been linked to a myriad of diseases, making these proteins an attractive target in drug research. Whilst PROTAC technology has had a significant impact in scientific research, its application to IMPs is still limited. Limitations of the traditional approach of immunoblotting in PROTAC research include the low throughput compared to other methods, as well as a lack of spatial information for the target. Here we compare orthogonal antibody based approaches, i.e. immunoblotting, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence, to measure PROTAC mediated degradation of two established, endogenous targets, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and hepatocyte growth-factor receptor (c-MET). We discuss advantages and limitations of each methodology for the assessment of PROTAC efficacy on IMPs. Overall, we recommend the use of immunofluorescence and flow cytometry, for an increased accuracy with both a qualitative and quantitative insight into degradation efficacy and a critical distinction between cell membrane-localized and intracellular IMP protein pools.

Indexed as

ErbB ReceptorsFlow CytometryProteolysisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunoblottingMembrane ProteinsEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMembrane ProteinsMET protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metc-METEGFRIntegral membrane proteinPROTACTargeted protein degradation

Identifiers

PMID39748066
PMCPMC11696238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.