ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhanced photovoltaic panel diagnostics through AI integration with experimental DC to DC Buck Boost converter implementation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid fuzzy C-means and deep learning framework for intelligent fault classification in solar PV systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based fault classification on photovoltaic plants using a low-cost open-source IoT system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of supervised machine learning models for electrical fault detection in solar PV systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health monitoring and analysis of photovoltaic (PV) systems are critical for optimizing energy efficiency, improving reliability, and extending the operational lifespan of PV power plants. Effective fault detection and monitoring are vital for ensuring the proper functioning and maintenance of these systems. PV power plants operating under fault conditions show significant deviations in current-voltage (I-V) characteristics compared to those under normal conditions. This paper introduces a diagnostic methodology for photovoltaic panels using I-V curves, enhanced by new techniques combining optimization and classification-based artificial intelligence. The research is organized into two key sections. The first section outlines the implementation of a DC/DC buck-boost converter, which is designed to extract and display real-time data from the PV system based on actual (I-V) measurements. The second section focuses on the comprehensive processing of the experimental dataset, where the Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) algorithm is combined with machine learning methods to identify the most critical features. The HHO algorithm is combined with an advanced machine learning model, XGBoost, to accurately detect faults within the PV system. The proposed HHO-XGBoost algorithm achieves an impressive accuracy of 99.49%, outperforming other classification-based artificial intelligence methods in fault detection. In validation and comparison with previous approaches, the HHO-XGBoost model consistently outperforms established methods such as GADF-ANN, PCA-SVM, PNN, and Fuzzy Logic, achieving an overall accuracy of 98.48%. This outstanding performance confirms the model's effectiveness in accurately diagnosing PV system conditions, further validating its robustness and reliability in fault detection and classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.