ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive markers of rapid disease progression and chemotherapy resistance in triple-negative breast cancer patients following postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel colchicine-binding site inhibitor suppresses triple-negative breast cancer growth and metastasis and synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in an immunogenic cancer model.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2026Article
- TMEM92 shields DDX3X from TTC3-mediated degradation to confer chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Nano-in-Micro GelMA depots assist electro-thermal-immuno orchestral treatment for solid triple negative breast tumor.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Modeling optimal timing of immunotherapy and chemotherapy to prevent resistance and recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes and Treatment-Related Complications in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of 24 Case Reports from 2020 to 2025.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Review
- Clinical and pathological indicators for predicting disease-free survival after radical surgery in elderly patients with early-stage triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- A novel prognostic tool for triple-negative breast cancer: creating and testing a parthanatos-related gene model.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Implication of an exosome-based gene signature for estimating clinical outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer and assisting in individualized therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a diverse category with a subset that displays particularly aggressive characteristics, referred to in this study as "rapid relapse" TNBC (rrTNBC). This term is defined as the occurrence of distant metastasis or death within 24 months post-diagnosis. The paper mainly studies the clinicopathologic traits of TNBC patients experiencing rapid disease progression and chemotherapy resistance and identify predictive markers for this outcome. A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 2294 TNBC patients who underwent surgery at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Of these, 369 were categorized as experiencing rapid relapse, while 1925 did not relapse rapidly. Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine potential markers predictive of rapid relapse post-chemotherapy. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses pinpointed several predictors of rapid relapse in TNBC patients post-chemotherapy. These include age at diagnosis (≥ 50 years, OR = 0.413, 95% CI: 0.289-0.590), postoperative pathological T staging (T2, OR = 2.557, 95% CI: 1.766-3.703; T3 + T4, OR = 3.725, 95% CI: 1.355-10.454), and N staging (N1, OR = 3.056, 95% CI: 2.021-4.619; N2, OR = 6.917, 95% CI: 3.920-12.206; N3, OR = 24.597, 95% CI: 11.875-50.948). Additionally, sTIL expression (intermediate, OR = 0.204, 95% CI: 0.139-0.300; high, OR = 0.020, 95% CI: 0.011-0.035) and Her2 expression (Her2 1+, OR = 0.470, 95% CI: 0.321-0.688) were identified as protective indicators against rapid relapse. A predictive model incorporating these predictors yielded a C-index of 0.898 in the training set and 0.938 in the validation set, with respective Brier scores of 0.079 and 0.073. The study successfully established and validated a predictive model for rapid disease progression and chemotherapy resistance in TNBC patients post-chemotherapy, demonstrating robust discrimination and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.