Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748016›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The development of an efficient artificial intelligence-based classification approach for colorectal cancer response to radiochemotherapy: deep learning vs. machine learning.

Fatemeh Bahrambanan, Meysam Alizamir, Kayhan Moradveisi, Salim Heddam, Sungwon Kim, Seunghyun Kim, Meysam Soleimani, Saeid Afshar, Amir Taherkhani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fatemeh Bahrambanan *Research Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. fbahramibanan@yahoo.com.
Meysam Alizamir *Institute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam. meysamalizamir@duytan.edu.vn.
Kayhan MoradveisiCivil Engineering Department, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Salim HeddamFaculty of Science, Agronomy Department, Hydraulics Division, University 20 Août 1955, Route El Hadaik BP 26, 21000, Skikda, Algeria.
Sungwon KimDepartment of Railroad Construction and Safety Engineering, Dongyang University, Yeongju, 36040, Republic of Korea.
Seunghyun KimDepartment of Biology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA.
Meysam SoleimaniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Saeid AfsharDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Medical School, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amir TaherkhaniResearch Center for Molecular Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a form of cancer that impacts both the rectum and colon. Typically, it begins with a small abnormal growth known as a polyp, which can either be non-cancerous or cancerous. Therefore, early detection of colorectal cancer as the second deadliest cancer after lung cancer, can be highly beneficial. Moreover, the standard treatment for locally advanced colorectal cancer, which is widely accepted around the world, is chemoradiotherapy. Then, in this study, seven artificial intelligence models including decision tree, K-nearest neighbors, Adaboost, random forest, Gradient Boosting, multi-layer perceptron, and convolutional neural network were implemented to detect patients responder and non-responder to radiochemotherapy. For finding the potential predictors (genes), three feature selection strategies were employed including mutual information, F-classif, and Chi-Square. Based on feature selection models, four different scenarios were developed and five, ten, twenty and thirty features selected for designing a more accurate classification paradigm. The results of this study confirm that random forest, Gradient Boosting, decision tree, and K-nearest neighbors provided more accurate results in terms of accuracy, by 93.8%. Moreover, Among the feature selection methods, mutual information and F-classif showed the best results, while Chi-Square produced the worst results. Therefore, the suggested artificial intelligence models can be successfully applied as a robust approach for classification of colorectal cancer response to radiochemotherapy for medical studies.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChemoradiotherapyColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningMachine LearningDecision TreesFemaleHumansClassificationColorectal cancerConvolutional neural networkDeep learningGradient BoostingRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39748016
PMCPMC11696929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.