ArticleScientific reports2025
Accuracy and operation procedure of robotic computer-aided implant surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Static, Dynamic, and Robotic Guided Surgery in Immediate Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Pooled it
- Robot-assisted Computer-Implant surgery : A comprehensive review of system architecture, clinical accuracy, and emerging technologies.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Robot-Assisted Dentistry: What the Evidence Supports and Which Outcomes Are Still Missing.Cureus · 2026Review
- Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery among novice operators using three different patient registration methods: an in-vitro study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: A Single-Round Survey on Standard, Short, and Zygomatic Implant-Supported Prostheses.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Education of Prosthodontics and Implant Dentistry: A Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- Real-Time Motion Compensation for Dynamic Dental Implant Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Accuracy of robot-assisted dental implant surgery and its clinical influencing factors: a retrospective case series of 100 patients.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Optimizing Implant Placement Timing and Loading Protocols for Successful Functional and Esthetic Outcomes: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Accuracy evaluation of robot-guided laser osteotomy for dental implant bed preparation - a digital high-tech procedure.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the accuracy of robotic computer-aided implant surgery (rCAIS) in partially edentulous patients using a standard operation procedure. Patients who underwent implant placement surgeries using the robotic system under a standard operation procedure were recruited. Deviations of dental implants were calculated after superimposition of the preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. The possible effects of the implant regions on these deviations were investigated. A total of 30 participants were enrolled in the study and 44 implants were inserted. The median (25th-75th percentile) global coronal deviation, global apical deviation, and angular deviation were 0.62 mm (0.46-1.00), 0.62 mm (0.49-1.01) and 1.16 (0.69-1.69) °, respectively. The jaw was a factor in the lateral coronal, vertical coronal, and vertical apical deviations (P < 0.05). Both the lateral coronal and apical deviations were greater for immediate implant placements than for delayed implant placements (P < 0.05). The implant dimensions significantly affected the apical deviation (P < 0.05). These results indicate that rCAIS based on a standard operation procedure is safe and accurate in partially edentulous patients. However, there remains a need to optimize robotic systems to simplify the workflow and improve their ability to recognize and respond to complex bone structures. Further clinical studies should also focus on comparing the long-term implant success rate and related complications of rCAIS with traditional approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.