ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficacy and safety of propranolol tablets vs. oral solution in neonates with severe infantile hemangiomas: a retrospective study in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Red Blood Cell Count and Hemoglobin Levels on Bone Remodeling in Mandibular Angle Osteotomy.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular safety of propranolol oral solution in infantile hemangiomas: a disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of diffuse abdominal infantile hemangioma: a case report emphasizing multimodality imaging and multidisciplinary management.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of propranolol hydrochloride tablets and oral solution in neonates with severe IHs. A retrospective cohort study included 184 consecutive neonates diagnosed with severe IHs and treated with propranolol from January 2016 to June 2023. Of these, 126 patients received propranolol tablets, and 58 received propranolol oral solution. The primary outcome assessed the treatment response post-discontinuation of propranolol, while the key secondary outcome measured changes in the hemangioma activity score (HAS). Out of 184 participants, 138 (75.5%) were female. The mean age at treatment initiation was 16 days (range: 10-22) for the tablet group and 14 days (range: 8-24) for the oral solution group. Following treatment, effective response rates were 74.6% in the tablet group and 87.9% in the oral solution group (P = 0.04). Improvement in the HAS was 63.95% for the tablet group and 65.57% for the oral solution group (P = 0.35). Adverse reactions included diarrhea in 29.0% of tablet group and 12.9% of oral solution group (P = 0.01), and sleep disturbances in 20.6% of tablet group and 8.6% of oral solution group (P = 0.04). In terms of sequelae, telangiectasia occurred in 34.9% of tablet group and 17.2% of oral solution group (P = 0.01). Propranolol oral solution showed superior efficacy and safety compared to tablets in treating neonates with severe IHs, suggesting it should be prioritized as the preferred treatment option for this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.