ArticleScientific reports2025
Genome-scale evolution in local populations of wild chimpanzees.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence for multiple past introgressions among chimpanzee subspecies during warming periods.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial diversity of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park Mountain Gorillas.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Exome analysis reveals species divergence in TYR and identifies species genetic markers in five endemic Macaca species on Sulawesi Island.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of genome-scale evolution has been difficult in large, endangered animals because opportunities to collect high-quality genetic samples are limited. There is a need for novel field-friendly, cost-effective genetic techniques. This study conducted an exome-wide analysis of a total of 42 chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) across six African regions, providing insights into population discrimination techniques. Wild chimpanzee DNA was extracted noninvasively from collected fecal samples using the lysis-buffer storage method. To target genome-scale regions of host DNA, exome-capture sequencing was performed using cost-effective baits originally designed for humans (closely related to chimpanzees). Multivariate analysis effectively discriminated differences in local populations, aiding in the identification of samples' geographical origins. Exome-wide heterozygosity was negatively correlated significantly with genome-wide nonsynonymous-synonymous substitution ratios, suggesting that mutation loads exist at the local population level. Exome sequences revealed functional diversity and protein-coding gene divergence. Segregating pseudogenes were comprehensively annotated, with many being population-specific and others shared among populations. Focusing on multicopy chemosensory receptor genes, the segregating pseudogenes OR7D4 (an olfactory receptor) and TAS2R42 (a bitter taste receptor) were shared among western and eastern chimpanzees. Overall, our analytical framework offers ecological insights into chimpanzees and may be applicable to other organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.