ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep learning-based multi-view approach to automatic 3D landmarking and deformity assessment of lower limb.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open access and digital morphology data in evolutionary biology: expanding frontiers of knowledge.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Automatic assessment of lower limb deformities using high-resolution X-ray images.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Investigating the Effect of Center of Rotation of Angulation (CORA) Location on Varus Knee Joint Mechanics.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomical Landmark detection in CT-Scan images is widely used in the identification of skeletal disorders. However, the traditional process of manually detecting anatomical landmarks, especially in three dimensions, is both time-consuming and prone to human errors. We propose a novel, deep-learning-based approach to automatic detection of 3D landmarks in CT images of the lower limb. We generate multiple view renderings of the scanned limb and then integrate them, using a pyramid-style convolutional neural network, to build a 3D model of the bone and to determine the spatial coordinates of the landmarks. Those landmarks are then used to calculate key anatomical indicators that would enable the reliable diagnosis of skeletal disorders. To evaluate the performance of the proposed approach we compare its predicted landmark coordinates and resulting anatomical indicators (both 2D and 3D) with those determined by human experts. The average coordinate error (difference between automatically and manually determined coordinates) of the landmarks was 2.05 ± 1.36 mm on test data, whereas the average angular error (difference between automatically and manually calculated angles in three and two dimensions) on the same dataset was 0.53 ± 0.66° and 0.74 ± 0.87°, respectively. Our proposed deep-learning-based approach not only outperforms the traditional landmark detection and indicator assessment methods in terms of speed and accuracy but also improves the credibility of the ensuing diagnoses by avoiding manual landmarking errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.