ArticleScientific reports2025
Adaptability evaluation model and experiment of full section SBM in deep strata based on AHP-fuzzy theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- China's environmental governance efficiency evaluation based on novel cross-efficiency network DEA model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To delve into the adaptability of the full section SBM boring process during its inaugural application, this paper innovatively put forward an adaptability evaluation model for the SBM shaft boring within composite deep strata. This model is with the degree of adaptability T as the quantitative criterion. Initially, the evaluation index system of SBM boring adaptability is established. The determination of the adaptive standard for evaluation indexes and the calculation parameters of the model is based on a comprehensive approach that encompasses rock abrasion testing and extensive field investigations. Furthermore, based on the principle of AHP, the weight total ranking of SBM boring adaptability evaluation indexes is given under this method. Ultimately, fuzzy mathematics theory is introduced, and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and its verification is conducted. The results show that: the five factors that have the greatest influence on the adaptability of SBM boring in composite deep strata are, in order: I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.