ArticleScientific reports2025
Gait-based Parkinson's disease diagnosis and severity classification using force sensors and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Parkinson's Disease Classification Using RGB Plantar Pressure Gait Images: A Comparative Study of CNN and Transformer Architectures.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CNN-GRU-KAN: A Novel Multi-Branch Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection Based on Gait Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Translation of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Gait Analysis Using Plantar Pressure and Ground Reaction Force.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Current Trends in AI Gait Analysis for the Detection and Assessment of Parkinson's Disease Severity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Performance Using Logit Transformation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A comprehensive survey on diagnosis and assessment of Parkinson's disease via plantar pressure analysis.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Digital Gait Biomarkers for Parkinson's Disease: Subject-Wise Validated Explainable AI Framework Using Vertical Ground Reaction Force Signals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying and predicting gait stability metrics in people with stroke in uneven-surface walking using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recurrence quantification analysis of gait for computer-aided diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Gait analysis for Parkinson's disease using multiscale entropy.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2025Review
- Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis and Severity Assessment from Gait Signals via Bayesian-Optimized Deep Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- CRISP: a correlation-filtered recursive feature elimination and integration of SMOTE pipeline for gait-based Parkinson's disease screening.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A dual-stage model for classifying Parkinson's disease severity, through a detailed analysis of Gait signals using force sensors and machine learning approaches, is proposed in this study. Parkinson's disease is the primary neurodegenerative disorder that results in a gradual reduction in motor function. Early detection and monitoring of the disease progression is highly challenging due to the gradual progression of symptoms and the inadequacy of conventional methods in identifying subtle changes in mobility. The proposed dual-stage model utilized a hypertuned Random Forest Tree (RFT) to classify the subjects into PD and non-PD classes at Stage 1 and a hypertuned Ensemble Regressor (ER) to predict the severity of illness at Stage 2. Further, we have implemented the proposed model on the data signals gathered from both feet of 166 participants using Vertical Ground Reaction Force Sensors (VGRF). The dataset comprised 93 persons with Parkinson's disease and 73 healthy controls. The dataset (imbalance) collected from both feet is passed to the preprocessing phase (for balancing data using the SMOTE method), followed by the feature extraction phase to extract features related to time, frequency, spatial, and temporal features domains that are highly effective for detecting and assigning severity levels of PD. A Recursive Feature Elimination method is also used to select the optimal set of features to improve the model performance. It is acknowledged that the early detection of Parkinson's disease is contingent upon critical parameters, including stride length, stance duration, swing interval, double limb support, step time, and step length. The crucial evaluation metrics used for evaluating model performance include accuracy, mean absolute error, and root mean square error. The findings indicate that the suggested model significantly surpasses current methodologies. It attained an accuracy of 97.5 ± 2.1%, Sensitivity of 97% ± 2.5%, and average Specificity of 95% ± 2.2% in differentiating between PD and non-PD participants utilizing RFT and evaluated disease severity with an average accuracy of 96.4 ± 2.3%, an average mean absolute error of 0.065 ± 0.024, and a root mean square error of 0.080 ± 0.06. The results indicate that the proposed dual-stage model is exceptionally successful in the early detection and severity assessment of Parkinson's disease and demonstrates better efficacy than alternative models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.