ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of partial and total replacement of fishmeal by soybean meal in feed on growth and gut performance of Penaeus vannamei.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physiological and Intestinal Microbiota Responses to the Feeding Stimulant Dimethyl-β-Propiothetin (DMPT) in Aquatic Animals-A Preliminary Study onAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Unlocking the hidden anatomy: synchrotron micro-tomography of the stomach, midgut, and organs in Penaeus vannamei and the potential route of Enterocytozoon hepatopaenaei (EHP) infection.Cell and tissue research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the growth and gut performance of shrimp fed three isonitrogenous diets (37% crude protein) with varying inclusions of fish meal (FM) and soybean meal (SBM): F1 (27.5% FM), F2 (10% FM + 23.5% SBM), and F3 (38% SBM). Over a 28-day period, feed intake, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and survival rates showed no significant differences among the groups. However, shrimp fed F2 and F3 exhibited significantly higher weight gain and average daily growth (ADG) compared to those fed F1 (P < 0.05). Gut performance analysis revealed that F3 consistently had the highest gut passage time (GPT), while F1 had the lowest. By day 28, shrimp fed F2 displayed elevated gut retention time (GRT). F1-fed shrimp showed a high gut passage rate (GPR), whereas F3-fed shrimp had a low GPR until day 21, with differences becoming negligible by day 28. Histological examination of the hepatopancreas revealed an increased R-cell population in shrimp fed F3. These findings highlight the adaptability of shrimp to different dietary compositions and underscore the importance of considering multiple factors when assessing the impacts of feed on growth and physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.