ArticleScientific reports2025
Tumor detection on bronchoscopic images by unsupervised learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pulmonary Endoscopy: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Directions.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Multi-adapter SAM-inspired bronchoscopic image segmentation for lung cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Performance of a self-developed panel for biogeographic ancestry inference and dissection of the genetic background of three Tibetan groups.Hereditas · 2025Article
- CRTSC: Channel-Wise Recalibration and Texture-Structural Consistency Constraint for Anomaly Detection in Medical Chest Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis and early identification of intratracheal tumors relies on the experience of the operators and the specialists. Operations by physicians with insufficient experience may lead to misdiagnosis or misjudgment of tumors. To address this issue, a datasets for intratracheal tumor detection has been constructed to simulate the diagnostic level of experienced specialists, and a Knowledge Distillation-based Memory Feature Unsupervised Anomaly Detection (KD-MFAD) model was proposed to learn from this simulated experience. The unsupervised training approach could effectively deal with the irregular features of the tumorous appearance. The Downward Deformable Convolution Module (DDC) allowed the encoding phase to provide more detailed internal airway environment features. The Memory Matrix based on Convolutional Block focusing (CB-Mem) helped the student model store more meaningful normal sample features during training and disrupted the reconstruction of "tumor" images. Our model achieved an AUC-ROC of 97.60%, Acc of 93.33%, and F1-score of 94.94% on our self-built intratracheal endoscopy datasets, improving baseline performance by 5 to 10%. Our model also demonstrated superior performance over existing models in the public datasets in the same field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.