ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of ICIs alone or in combination rechallenged outcomes after progression from first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancing immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge: key insights into efficacy, safety, and personalized strategies in advanced solid tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Rilvegostomig for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A First-In-Human Phase I/II Clinical Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Rechallenge After Prior Immunotherapy in Patients Aged ≥ 60 Years with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- Article
- The evolving role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human endostatin injection plus immune checkpoint inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: a single-centered, retrospective study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Pre-treatment inflammatory markers can identify the risk of immune-related toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Beyond Progression in Various Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Towards the Prediction of Responses to Cancer Immunotherapy: A Multi-Omics Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have become the standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR/ALK negative. However, there is no clear second-line treatment option after first-line treatment failure. To investigate the efficacy and safety of ICIs alone or in combination rechallenge treatment after first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy progression in advanced NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of patients who received ICIs alone or in combination rechallenge treatment after first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy progression in advanced NSCLC at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and May 2024. We evaluated the effects of continued immunotherapy on patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events after first-line treatment progression, and analyzed the relationship between outcomes and clinical characteristics. A total of 154 patients were included, with 146 patients developing resistance, 8 patients showing no progression. The ORR was 16.44%, the DCR was 68.49%, and the median PFS was 4.6 months. Patients treated with the new immune drug therapy had longer PFS than those treated with the original immunotherapy (5.0 months vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.0438). The PFS in patients receiving ICIs plus targeted therapy was significantly longer than that in patients who receiving ICIs alone, chemo-ICIs plus targeted therapy and ICIs plus chemotherapy (chemo-ICIs) (5.7 months vs. 3.6 months vs3.2 months vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.0086). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment regimen was a risk factor for immune rechallenge PFS, but there was no statistical correlation between gender, age, smoking history, pathological type, intermittent treatment or first-line drug resistance and immune rechallenge PFS. Our findings suggest that selecting ICIs plus targeted therapy may improve PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC after first-line chemo-ICIs progression. while replacement with new BSAb/PD-1 may be more beneficial to patients. However, there is a lack of large sample randomized controlled studies and evidence-based medical evidence, and more clinical studies are needed to further confirm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.