Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747923›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analysis of ICIs alone or in combination rechallenged outcomes after progression from first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Guisen Yin, Xin Liu, Xiangtao Yu, Song Tan, Fen Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rilvegostomig for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A First-In-Human Phase I/II Clinical Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guisen YinDepartment of Pharmacy, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Oncology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Xiangtao YuDepartment of Pharmacy, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Song TanDepartment of Oncology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
Fen LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. liufen@hnca.org.cn.

Funding

Binzhou Medical College Traditional Chinese Medicine Discipline Integration Science and Technology Program 2024ZYYKJ09Hunan Provincial Health Commission Project D202313017815Shandong Provincial natural fund project ZR2022LZY013Shandong Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Project M-2022039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have become the standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR/ALK negative. However, there is no clear second-line treatment option after first-line treatment failure. To investigate the efficacy and safety of ICIs alone or in combination rechallenge treatment after first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy progression in advanced NSCLC. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of patients who received ICIs alone or in combination rechallenge treatment after first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy progression in advanced NSCLC at Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 2020 and May 2024. We evaluated the effects of continued immunotherapy on patients' objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events after first-line treatment progression, and analyzed the relationship between outcomes and clinical characteristics. A total of 154 patients were included, with 146 patients developing resistance, 8 patients showing no progression. The ORR was 16.44%, the DCR was 68.49%, and the median PFS was 4.6 months. Patients treated with the new immune drug therapy had longer PFS than those treated with the original immunotherapy (5.0 months vs. 3.7 months, p = 0.0438). The PFS in patients receiving ICIs plus targeted therapy was significantly longer than that in patients who receiving ICIs alone, chemo-ICIs plus targeted therapy and ICIs plus chemotherapy (chemo-ICIs) (5.7 months vs. 3.6 months vs3.2 months vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.0086). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment regimen was a risk factor for immune rechallenge PFS, but there was no statistical correlation between gender, age, smoking history, pathological type, intermittent treatment or first-line drug resistance and immune rechallenge PFS. Our findings suggest that selecting ICIs plus targeted therapy may improve PFS in patients with advanced NSCLC after first-line chemo-ICIs progression. while replacement with new BSAb/PD-1 may be more beneficial to patients. However, there is a lack of large sample randomized controlled studies and evidence-based medical evidence, and more clinical studies are needed to further confirm.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsChemotherapyFirst lineImmune checkpoint inhibitorsNon-small cell lung cancerProgressionSurvival

Identifiers

PMID39747923
PMCPMC11696066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.