Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747917›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A robust and interpretable ensemble machine learning model for predicting healthcare insurance fraud.

Zeyu Wang, Xiaofang Chen, Yiwei Wu, Linke Jiang, Shiming Lin, Gang Qiu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zeyu WangSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian, China.
Xiaofang ChenXiang'an Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361101, Fujian, China.
Yiwei WuSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian, China.
Linke JiangSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian, China.
Shiming LinSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian, China. xmulsm@xmu.edu.cn.
Gang QiuSchool of Information Engineering, Changji University, Changji, 831100, Xinjiang, China. 49041128@qq.com.

Funding

2023 Teaching Research and Reform Program for Undergraduate Education in Autonomous Colleges and Universities XJGXZHJG-202341Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 2023D01C55Scientific Research Pro- gram of the Higher Education Institution of XinJiang XJEDU2023P127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare insurance fraud imposes a significant financial burden on healthcare systems worldwide, with annual losses reaching billions of dollars. This study aims to improve fraud detection accuracy using machine learning techniques. Our approach consists of three key stages: data preprocessing, model training and integration, and result analysis with feature interpretation. Initially, we examined the dataset's characteristics and employed embedded and permutation methods to test the performance and runtime of single models under different feature sets, selecting the minimal number of features that could still achieve high performance. We then applied ensemble techniques, including Voting, Weighted, and Stacking methods, to combine different models and compare their performances. Feature interpretation was achieved through partial dependence plots (PDP), SHAP, and LIME, allowing us to understand each feature's impact on the predictions. Finally, we benchmarked our approach against existing studies to evaluate its advantages and limitations. The findings demonstrate improved fraud detection accuracy and offer insights into the interpretability of machine learning models in this context.

Indexed as

FraudInsurance, HealthMachine LearningHumansHealthcare insurance fraudMachine learningModel ensembleModel interpretability

Identifiers

PMID39747917
PMCPMC11697271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.