ArticleScientific reports2025
Employing a low-code machine learning approach to predict in-hospital mortality and length of stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Low-Code AI Platform for Developing a Neonatal Multimodal Pain Classification Model.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Predictive Value of Traditional and Novel Composite Inflammatory Indicators for Severe and Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with high mortality rates and often results in prolonged hospital stays. The potential of machine learning to enhance prediction accuracy in this context is significant, yet clinicians often lack the programming skills required for effective data mining. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a low-code approach for assisting clinicians with data mining for mortality and length of stay (LOS) prediction in patients with CAP. A retrospective study was conducted using a low-code platform and the PyCaret library in Google Colab on data from patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) admitted between January 2013 and December 2021 to two medical facilities. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for mortality prediction and the R2 score for LOS prediction, with benchmarks set at AUC > 0.9 and R2 > 0.5. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was used for interpreting individual predictions. A total of 669 CAP patients were enrolled in the analysis.Fifteen models were evaluated for mortality prediction, and nineteen models were evaluated for LOS prediction utilizing the PyCaret library. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine model yielded the highest AUC (0.963) for mortality prediction. In predicting LOS, the Extratrees Regressor model achieved the highest R2 score of 0.585. Factors such as the severity of pneumonia and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were significant factors influencing mortality. For the LOS, the CCI score, activities of daily living, and social support were significant predictors. The low-code approach enables medical professionals with limited technical expertise to effectively employ data science in their clinical decision-making process. This approach proved to be a valuable tool in the analysis of CAP patient data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.