ArticleNature communications2025
Unravelling nonclassical beam damage mechanisms in metal-organic frameworks by low-dose electron microscopy.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multilevel molecular weaving.Nature materials · 2026Article
- Beyond structure: spectroscopic imaging in cryogenic electron microscopy.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Resolving and Controlling Silicoaluminophosphate Zeolite Intergrowths and Mixtures.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Graphene-Based Liquid Cell Designs for In Situ Liquid-Phase Transmission Electron Microscopy: Recent Developments and Perspectives.Small science · 2025Review
- Vitamin-Conjugated Metallic Nanoparticles: Applications for Antimicrobial and Anti-Cancer Drug Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metallocene-anchor inducing oriented MOF membrane for helium separation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Structure of Anhydrous Sodium Valproate with 3D Electron Diffraction and a Facile Sample Preparation Workflow.ACS central science · 2025Article
- Advancing atomic electron tomography with neural networks.Applied microscopy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in direct electron detectors and low-dose imaging techniques have opened up captivating possibilities for real-space visualization of radiation-induced structural dynamics. This has significantly contributed to our understanding of electron-beam radiation damage in materials, serving as the foundation for modern electron microscopy. In light of these developments, the exploration of more precise and specific beam damage mechanisms, along with the development of associated descriptive models, has expanded the theoretical framework of radiation damage beyond classical mechanisms. We unravel, in this work, the nonclassical beam damage mechanisms of an open-framework material, i.e. UiO-66(Hf) metal-organic framework, by integrating low-dose electron microscopy and ab initio simulations of radiation induced structural dynamics. The physical origins of radiation damage phenomena, spanning across multiple scales including morphological, lattice, and molecular levels, have been unequivocally unveiled. Based on these observations, potential alternative mechanisms including reversible radiolysis and radiolysis-enhanced knock-on displacement are proposed, which account for their respective dynamic crystalline-to-amorphous interconversion and site-specific ligand knockout events occurring during continuous beam radiation. The current study propels the fundamental understanding of beam damage mechanisms from dynamic and correlated perspectives. Moreover, it fuels technical innovations, such as low-dose ultrafast electron microscopy, enabling imaging of beam-sensitive materials with uncompromised spatial resolution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.