Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747885›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Effectiveness of tacrolimus therapy in refractory ulcerative colitis compared to infliximab with propensity score matching.

Takeo Yoshihara, Takahiro Amano, Shinichiro Shinzaki, Yuri Tsujii, Akiko Asakura, Taku Tashiro, Mizuki Tani, Yuriko Otake-Kasamoto, Takuya Yamada, Yuko Sakakibara and 22 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Takeo Yoshihara *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takahiro Amano *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Shinichiro ShinzakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuri TsujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Akiko AsakuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Taku TashiroDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Mizuki TaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuriko Otake-KasamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takuya YamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Yuko SakakibaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Naoto OsugiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.
Shuji IshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Satoshi EgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu ArakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center, Kawachinagano, Japan.
Yuki ArimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan.
Masanori NakaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ikeda City Hospital, Ikeda, Japan.
Yoko MurayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Japan.
Ichizo KobayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan.
Kazuo KinoshitaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nishinomiya Municipal Central Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Satoshi HiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Narihiro ShibukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Daini Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masato KomoriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan.
Yorihide OkudaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Takashi KizuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraEnvironmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Minoru KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yoshiki TsujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Takahiro InoueDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hideki IijimaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshito HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tetsuo TakeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 K1, Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. takehara@gh.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is insufficient evidence comparing the outcomes of tacrolimus-based remission induction therapy with infliximab in refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) and evidence regarding optimal strategies after tacrolimus-based remission induction therapy. We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients with UC treated with tacrolimus or infliximab between January 2010 and March 2019. The proportion of clinical remission at week 8 and cumulative colectomy-free rate were examined using propensity score matching analysis. The predictors for colectomy after tacrolimus induction were also investigated. Ninety patients in the tacrolimus group and 151 in the infliximab group were enrolled. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was 65.2% in the matched tacrolimus group and 37.3% in the matched infliximab group (P = 0.0016), and the long-term colectomy-free rate was lower in the matched tacrolimus group than in the matched infliximab group (P = 0.0003). After clinical remission with tacrolimus, a serum albumin level of ≤ 3.5 g/dL at week 8 was extracted as a factor predicting colectomy (area under the curve: 0.94). Tacrolimus showed a higher remission induction effect for UC compared to infliximab. However, a high rate of colectomy after transition to maintenance treatment was found to be a concern for tacrolimus therapy.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeInfliximabPropensity ScoreTacrolimusAdultColectomyFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabTacrolimusCalcineurin inhibitorsPropensity score matching analysisUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID39747885
PMCPMC11696101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.