ArticleNature communications2025
Maximizing the clinical utility and performance of cytology samples for comprehensive genetic profiling.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-analytical Best Practices for RNA Sequencing from Small Biopsies and Cytologic Specimens.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Ultrarapid BRAF mutation detection on supernatant cell-free DNA obtained by FNA: An accurate and expedient method for BRAF assessment in aggressive thyroid carcinomas.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy and molecular adequacy between conventional endobronchial ultrasound, contrast-enhanced endobronchial ultrasound and elastography for hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathies: a retrospective observational study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Unraveling the nexus: Tumor mutational burden, PD-L1 expression, and oncogenic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer cytology specimens.Cancer cytopathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive molecular profiling by next-generation sequencing has revolutionized tumor classification and biomarker evaluation. However, routine implementation is challenged by the scant nature of diagnostic material obtained through minimally invasive procedures. Here, we describe our long-term experience in profiling cytology samples with an in-depth assessment of the performance, quality metrics, biomarker identification capabilities, and potential pitfalls. We highlight the impact of several optimization strategies to maximize performance with 4,871 prospectively sequenced clinical cytology samples tested by MSK-IMPACT
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.