Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747778›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025

Fatal acute uterine inversion post-vaginal delivery: an autopsy-based case report.

Arijit Datta, Darshan Galoria, Sweta Sinha, Arpan Kumar Pan

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arijit DattaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Pramukhswami Medical College & Sri Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9153-3088
Darshan GaloriaDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Pramukhswami Medical College & Sri Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Sweta SinhaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pramukhswami Medical College & Sri Krishna Hospital, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India.
Arpan Kumar PanDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana (Ambala), Haryana, India. arpankumarpan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2652-6903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine inversion refers to the condition where the fundus is turned inside and positioned within the uterine cavity. Uterine inversion is a life-threatening and uncommon obstetric emergency that can be fatal because of postpartum hemorrhage and shock. Acute uterine inversion is the most common type, which occurs within 24 h of delivery and is usually associated with untrained birth attendants and a lack of knowledge of labor-inducing drugs. We present a case of alleged medical negligence in the death of a 23-year-old female following vaginal delivery of a second child with autopsy findings suggestive of uterine inversion. The primary cause of death in this patient was postpartum hemorrhage and shock resulting from acute uterine inversion. This case underscores the importance of postmortem examinations in determining responsibility in legal proceedings.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricPostpartum HemorrhageUterine InversionFatal OutcomeFemaleHumansMalpracticePregnancyShockYoung AdultForensic pathologyMedical negligencePostpartum hemorrhageUterine inversionVaginal delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.