ReviewInsights into imaging2025
Application and progress of non-invasive imaging in predicting lung invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma under the new IASLC grading guidelines.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prognostic significance of the IASLC grading system in ALK-positive invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung: correlation with clinicopathological features.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2026Article
- Nonlinear association between standardized uptake value (SUV) index based onQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of high-grade growth patterns in invasive adenocarcinomas manifesting as ground-glass lesions via clinical and qualitative and quantitative computed tomography features.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A Sensor-Oriented Multimodal Medical Data Acquisition and Modeling Framework for Tumor Grading and Treatment Response Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The study of dual-phaseScientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA) being the most common type and carrying a poor prognosis. In 2020, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) pathology committee proposed a new histological grading system, which offers more precise prognostic assessments by combining the proportions of major and high-grade histological patterns. Accurate identification of lung INMA grading is crucial for clinical diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis evaluation. Currently, non-invasive imaging methods (such as CT, PET/CT, and MRI) are increasingly being studied to predict the new grading of lung INMA, showing promising application prospects. This review outlines the establishment and prognostic efficiency of the new IASLC grading system, highlights the application and latest progress of non-invasive imaging techniques in predicting lung INMA grading, and discusses their role in personalized treatment of lung INMA and future research directions. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The new IASLC grading system has important prognostic implications for patients with lung invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (INMA), and non-invasive imaging methods can be used to predict it, thereby improving patient prognoses. KEY POINTS: The new IASLC grading system more accurately prognosticates for patients with lung INMA. Preoperative prediction of the new grading is challenging because of the complexity of INMA subtypes. It is feasible to apply non-invasive imaging methods to predict the new IASLC grading system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.