Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747758›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Temporal dynamics of activation and suppression in a spatial Stroop task: A distribution analysis on gaze and arrow targets.

Yoshihiko Tanaka, Takato Oyama, Kenta Ishikawa, Matia Okubo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoshihiko TanakaGraduate School of Humanities, Senshu University, 2-1-1 Higashimita, Tama-Ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 214-8580, Japan. yoshihikot@psy.senshu-u.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-5776
Takato OyamaFaculty of Human Informatics, Aichi Shukutoku University, Nagakute, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-4705
Kenta IshikawaDepartment of Psychology, Teikyo University, Hachioji, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-6681
Matia OkuboDepartment of Psychology, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1398-6062

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 23K03005Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24KJ1995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directional judgments of an arrow became slower when the direction and location were incongruent in a spatial Stroop task (i.e., a standard congruency effect). In contrast, gaze judgments were slower when they were congruent (i.e., a reversed congruency effect). This study examined the reaction time (RT) distribution of interference effects in a spatial Stroop task to clarify the temporal characteristics of the standard congruency effect, which is known to be reversed for social targets, such as gaze direction. Participants responded to laterally presented targets (i.e., arrows, gaze, fish-only, and fish with mosaic) while ignoring their location. The standard congruency effect of arrows decreased as the overall RT increased, reflecting the temporal decay of automatically activated task-irrelevant codes (i.e., location). Critically, the reversed congruency effect of gaze increased as the overall RT increased. This result supports the dual-stage hypothesis and reflects the late-arriving selective inhibition of task-irrelevant codes. Similar results were replicated in Experiment 2, in which we manipulated the complexity of the backgrounds of nonsocial targets and in the reanalysis of existing data. These findings imply that the interplay between task-irrelevant activation and subsequent inhibition is modulated by specific stimulus characteristics, influencing spatial response selection.

Indexed as

AttentionFixation, OcularInhibition, PsychologicalOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualReaction TimeSpace PerceptionStroop TestAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultArrowDelta plotsGazeSpatial Stroop task

Identifiers

PMID39747758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.