ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Temporal dynamics of activation and suppression in a spatial Stroop task: A distribution analysis on gaze and arrow targets.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stimulus Incongruency Effects on Visual Short-Term Memory Binding in Young and Older Adults with and Without Cognitive Impairment.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- When gaze conflicts with space: Implicit eye contact and the reversed congruency effect.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- How visual eccentricity shapes conflict via target and distractor processing in the Simon task.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Investigating the gaze-driven reversed congruency effect in the spatial Stroop task: A distributional approach.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2025Article
- Ethnicity does not matter: Comparable reversed congruency effects for gaze stimuli from same- and other-ethnicity faces.Psychological research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Directional judgments of an arrow became slower when the direction and location were incongruent in a spatial Stroop task (i.e., a standard congruency effect). In contrast, gaze judgments were slower when they were congruent (i.e., a reversed congruency effect). This study examined the reaction time (RT) distribution of interference effects in a spatial Stroop task to clarify the temporal characteristics of the standard congruency effect, which is known to be reversed for social targets, such as gaze direction. Participants responded to laterally presented targets (i.e., arrows, gaze, fish-only, and fish with mosaic) while ignoring their location. The standard congruency effect of arrows decreased as the overall RT increased, reflecting the temporal decay of automatically activated task-irrelevant codes (i.e., location). Critically, the reversed congruency effect of gaze increased as the overall RT increased. This result supports the dual-stage hypothesis and reflects the late-arriving selective inhibition of task-irrelevant codes. Similar results were replicated in Experiment 2, in which we manipulated the complexity of the backgrounds of nonsocial targets and in the reanalysis of existing data. These findings imply that the interplay between task-irrelevant activation and subsequent inhibition is modulated by specific stimulus characteristics, influencing spatial response selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39747758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.