Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747733›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Do pollinators play a role in shaping the essential amino acids found in nectar?

Rachel H Parkinson, Eileen F Power, Kieran Walter, Alex E McDermott-Roberts, Jonathan G Pattrick, Geraldine A Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel H ParkinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8192-3178
Eileen F PowerDepartment of Botany, Trinity College, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.
Kieran WalterDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-2047-7180
Alex E McDermott-RobertsDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-6428-9834
Jonathan G PattrickDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-5500
Geraldine A WrightDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-021X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBI000968/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S000402/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2020-393Royal Society NIF\R1\191468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants produce floral nectar as a reward for pollinators, which contains carbohydrates and amino acids (AAs). We designed experiments to test whether pollinators could exert selection pressure on the profiles of AAs in nectar. We used HPLC to measure the free AAs and sugars in the nectar of 102 UK plant species. Six distinct profiles of essential amino acids (EAAs) were defined using the relative proportions of AAs with a clustering algorithm; we then tested bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) preferences for the EAA profiles and proline using a two-choice assay. We found a phylogenetic signal for the proportions of phenylalanine, methionine and proline as well as the total concentrations of essential and nonessential amino acids. However, there was no phylogenetic signal for EAA profile. Bumblebees did not exhibit a preference for any of the six EAA nectar profiles; however, four of the EAA profiles stimulated feeding. By contrast, bumblebees avoided proline in an inverse concentration-dependent manner. Our data indicate that bees are likely to have mechanisms for the postingestive evaluation of free AAs in solution but are unlikely to taste EAAs at nectar-relevant quantities. We predict that EAAs increase nectar value to bumblebees postingestively.

Indexed as

Amino Acids, EssentialPlant NectarPollinationAnimalsBeesFeeding BehaviorPhylogenyProlineSugarsAmino Acids, EssentialPlant NectarProlineSugarsBombus terrestrisbumblebeefeeding preferencesmethioninephenylalanineprolinereward

Identifiers

PMID39747733
PMCPMC11798901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.