ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Bevacizumab exerts dose-dependent risk for intracranial hemorrhage in patients with malignant gliomas.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative dosing of bevacizumab for radiation necrosis: impact of tumor type on edema response.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Intratumoral hemorrhage in patients with brain metastasis from systemic tumors: risk factors and prognostic assessment.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBevacizumab, an anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, has become a mainstay therapeutic in the management of malignant glioma. It is unknown if the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), a major complication associated with bevacizumab use, is dose-dependent.
methodsThis was a single institution retrospective analysis of patients treated with bevacizumab for the management of gliomas between 2009 and 2022. Incidence rates of ICH between patients receiving low-dose (< 5 mg/kg/week) and conventional-dose (5 mg/kg/week) bevacizumab regimens were compared via competing risk analysis over time. We evaluated post-progression survival (PPS) as a secondary outcome using multivariate Cox regression.
resultsOne hundred and seventy-three patients were identified (low-dose group, n = 51, conventional-dose group, n = 122) for inclusion in our analysis. Cumulative incidence rates of all cases of ICH and clinically symptomatic cases of ICH were higher in the conventional-dose (17.2% for all cases, 13.7% for symptomatic) relative to the low-dose group (3.9% for all cases, 2.0% for symptomatic); p-value 0.0296 for all cases, p-value 0.0274 for symptomatic cases. On multivariate Fine-Gray regression, conventional-dose bevacizumab therapy remained significantly associated with increased risk for symptomatic ICH (SHR 8.0560; p-value 0.0442). No difference in PPS was observed between the low-dose versus conventional-dose groups.
conclusionsConventional-dose bevacizumab therapy (5 mg/kg/week) is associated with increased incidence of ICH in patients with malignant glioma compared to lower dose bevacizumab (< 5 mg/kg/week) in this single center retrospective cohort. No difference in PPS was observed between the low-dose versus conventional-dose groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39747716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.