Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747705›Full record

ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2025

[Interprofessional and interdisciplinary collaboration in the implementation of health services research in pain medicine].

Stefanie Berger, Leonie Schouten, Franziska Mauz, Frank Petzke, Andrea Kurz, Ulrike Kaiser

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefanie BergerInstitut für Pflegewissenschaft und -praxis, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Österreich.
Leonie SchoutenSchmerzmedizin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Franziska MauzKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Frank PetzkeSchmerzmedizin, Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Andrea KurzFakultät Soziale Arbeit und Gesundheit, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaft und Kunst Hildesheim/Holzminden/Göttingen, Goschentor 1, 31134, Hildesheim, Deutschland.
Ulrike KaiserKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Deutschland. ulrike.kaiser@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-9028

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health services research looks at a form of care under contextual conditions. Often, and especially in the treatment of recurrent or chronic pain, these forms of care are complex interventions. Ensuring internal validity for subsequent interpretability of the results achieved as an essential requirement for studies in health services research therefore presents researchers with the challenge that they have to develop complex study protocols and implement and monitor them in clinical care. By its very nature, interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMST) involves multimodal interventions in an interdisciplinary care setting. In the reality of care, contextual factors for the effectiveness and feasibility of IMST are of great importance. On the one hand, health services research provides appropriate recommendations for the planning, implementation and evaluation of studies on complex interventions under contextual conditions, which can be of great importance for further research into the effectiveness of IMST. On the other hand, experience from interdisciplinary pain research can also help to successfully plan and conduct studies on complex interventions. This article introduces the understanding of interdisciplinarity (and interprofessionalism) in pain medicine and research, outlines possible key points for study planning and implementation using the example of two health services research studies and concludes by discussing gaps in research on interdisciplinary collaboration in pain medicine and research.

Indexed as

Chronic PainCooperative BehaviorHealth Services ResearchInterdisciplinary CommunicationInterdisciplinary ResearchIntersectoral CollaborationPain ManagementPatient Care TeamCombined Modality TherapyGermanyHealth Plan ImplementationHumansCombined modality therapy/painComplex interventionsInterdisciplinary pain treatmentRequirements for public health studiesTeam-based collaboration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.