Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747679›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2025

International multicenter validation of AI-driven ultrasound detection of ovarian cancer.

Filip Christiansen, Emir Konuk, Adithya Raju Ganeshan, Robert Welch, Joana Palés Huix, Artur Czekierdowski, Francesco Paolo Giuseppe Leone, Lucia Anna Haak, Robert Fruscio, Adrius Gaurilcikas and 21 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound models for assessment of ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Filip Christiansen *Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-9611
Emir Konuk *School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9437-4553
Adithya Raju GaneshanDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8216-6458
Robert WelchDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1819-6120
Joana Palés HuixSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0008-4117-1638
Artur CzekierdowskiDepartment of Gynecological Oncology and Gynecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Francesco Paolo Giuseppe LeoneUnit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Lucia Anna HaakInstitute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5749-7968
Robert FruscioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5688-2194
Adrius GaurilcikasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Dorella FranchiUnit of Preventive Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3950-5538
Daniela FischerovaGynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7224-3218
Elisa MorFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Luca SavelliObstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Forlì and Faenza Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
Maria Àngela PascualDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproduction, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5095-6981
Marek Jerzy KudlaDepartment of Perinatology and Oncological Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Stefano GuerrieroCentro Integrato di Procreazione Medicalmente Assistita e Diagnostica Ostetrico-Ginecologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria-Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Francesca BuonomoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6587-2622
Karina LiubaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Nina MontikSection of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Juan Luis AlcázarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ekaterini DomaliFirst Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-3040
Nelinda Catherine P PangilinanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rizal Medical Center, Manila, Philippines.
Chiara CarellaUnit of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-2690-5686
Maria MunarettoGynecologic and Obstetric Unit, Women's and Children's Department, Forlì Hospital, Forlì, Italy.
Petra SaskovaGynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5367-8056
Debora VerriGynecology and Breast Care Center, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7406-8804
Chiara VisenziFondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.
Pawel HermanSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kevin SmithSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elisabeth EpsteinDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. elisabeth.epstein@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-2298-7785

Funding

Cancerfonden (Swedish Cancer Society) 211657 Pi 01 HRadiumhemmets Forskningsfonder (Cancer Research Foundations of Radiumhemmet) 231143Vetenskapsrdet (Swedish Research Council) 2020-01702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian lesions are common and often incidentally detected. A critical shortage of expert ultrasound examiners has raised concerns of unnecessary interventions and delayed cancer diagnoses. Deep learning has shown promising results in the detection of ovarian cancer in ultrasound images; however, external validation is lacking. In this international multicenter retrospective study, we developed and validated transformer-based neural network models using a comprehensive dataset of 17,119 ultrasound images from 3,652 patients across 20 centers in eight countries. Using a leave-one-center-out cross-validation scheme, for each center in turn, we trained a model using data from the remaining centers. The models demonstrated robust performance across centers, ultrasound systems, histological diagnoses and patient age groups, significantly outperforming both expert and non-expert examiners on all evaluated metrics, namely F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Cohen's kappa, Matthew's correlation coefficient, diagnostic odds ratio and Youden's J statistic. Furthermore, in a retrospective triage simulation, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostic support reduced referrals to experts by 63% while significantly surpassing the diagnostic performance of the current practice. These results show that transformer-based models exhibit strong generalization and above human expert-level diagnostic accuracy, with the potential to alleviate the shortage of expert ultrasound examiners and improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39747679
PMCPMC11750711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.