ReviewHNO2025
[Development of paranasal sinus surgery in Austria and Switzerland: past, present, and future].
Review in HNO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thanks to our predecessors and technical progress, we can nowadays offer our patients a safe and modern paranasal sinus surgery. This article provides an overview of the historical development of paranasal sinus surgery in Austria and Switzerland and to shed light on the dynamic progress of this discipline in an international context. Paranasal sinus surgery has undergone significant change in recent decades, driven by rapid technological advances that have significantly improved surgical procedures and operative outcomes. While indications were originally limited to treatment of inflammatory diseases, today, endoscopic procedures cover interventions in the area of the anterior skull base, the orbit and sinonasal tumors. The concept of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) may seem simple, but the anatomic variability, especially in the area of the frontal sinus, as well as the wide spectrum and severity of diseases can be a challenge. Therefore, paranasal sinus surgery should not be a casual operation and should only be performed by well-trained surgeons to prevent disease recurrence as well as medical and economic follow-up costs. Standardized surgical training for aspiring paranasal sinus and skull base surgeons is critical. Preoperative planning through systematic analysis of CT images is an essential factor to achieve optimal results and to avoid intraoperative complications. The pathophysiological understanding of sinonasal disease and the recent developments of new drug therapies such as monoclonal antibodies also enable excellent results in the small subgroup of patients who do not benefit from a combination of surgical rehabilitation and long-term drug therapy. The dynamic development of endoscopic paranasal sinus surgery in recent decades shows the potential of the field for the coming decades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.