ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
European consensus on endoscopic surgery for bilateral vocal fold immobility: classification and nomenclature.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are inconsistencies in how different endoscopic procedures to manage Bilateral Vocal Fold Immobility (BVFI) have been described in the literature. This limits our ability to compare functional outcomes. There is no unifying international terminology available that precisely describes the anatomical boundaries and extent of the different types of treatment. A pan-European consensus regarding terminology of different endoscopic surgical procedures to manage BVFI in adults was developed.
methodsThirty-one expert laryngologists and phoniatricians of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) or Union of the European Phoniatricians (UEP), participated in a modified Delphi process. They voted on an initial series of 13 proposed statements, including graphical visualization of different endoscopic surgical techniques for BVFI. Statements reaching > 70% of agreement in the first voting round were accepted. In the second voting round, eight revised and newly proposed statements were accepted with an increased threshold of > 80%.
resultsFourteen statements were anonymously validated through two voting rounds. The following categories of endoscopic arytenoid and vocal fold surgery were defined: total arytenoidectomy, partial arytenoidectomy (subclassified into subtotal, anteromedial, posteromedial and superomedial), posterior cordectomy (subclassified into ligamental, transmuscular and ventriculocordectomy) and transverse cordotomy (subclassified into posterior cordotomy and ventriculocordotomy). The suffixes 'with mucosal preservation', 'with laterofixation' and 'combined procedure' were defined too.
conclusionThis ELS-UEP consensus on endoscopic arytenoid and vocal fold surgery for BVFI provides a practical nomenclature and classification to improve reporting in literature and clinical practice and to allow comparison of functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39747669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.