ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Cost-effectiveness of AI for pediatric diabetic eye exams from a health system perspective.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Economic evaluation of AI-assisted technologies in healthcare: A systematic review.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2025Pooled it
- Applications of artificial intelligence in early childhood health management: a systematic review from fetal to pediatric periods.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Social Determinants of Digital Health Intervention Use in China: National Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A decade of artificial intelligence research in ophthalmology: Global trends and transferable insights for medical AI.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- FairGen: preference-aligned diffusion for demographically equitable medical image synthesis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- From Bench to Bedside: The Path Toward Real-World Translation for Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Cancer Detection.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Impact of artificial intelligence on the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of ophthalmic disease screening services: a scoping review.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Financial incentives increase uptake and perceived effectiveness of autonomous medical AI, yet patients still seek human reconfirmation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Nursing for Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence to Deliver Healthcare From the Eye.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Health Economic Considerations for the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autonomous artificial intelligence (AI) for pediatric diabetic retinal disease (DRD) screening has demonstrated safety, effectiveness, and the potential to enhance health equity and clinician productivity. We examined the cost-effectiveness of an autonomous AI strategy versus a traditional eye care provider (ECP) strategy during the initial year of implementation from a health system perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was the main outcome measure. Compared to the ECP strategy, the base-case analysis shows that the AI strategy results in an additional cost of $242 per patient screened to a cost saving of $140 per patient screened, depending on health system size and patient volume. Notably, the AI screening strategy breaks even and demonstrates cost savings when a pediatric endocrine site screens 241 or more patients annually. Autonomous AI-based screening consistently results in more patients screened with greater cost savings in most health system scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.