Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747589›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

Malignancy risk stratification for pulmonary nodules: comparing a deep learning approach to multiparametric statistical models in different disease groups.

Lars Piskorski, Manuel Debic, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Kai Schlamp, Linn Welzel, Oliver Weinheimer, Alan Arthur Peters, Mark Oliver Wielpütz, Thomas Frauenfelder, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lars PiskorskiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel DebicDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oyunbileg von StackelbergDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kai SchlampTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Linn WelzelDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver WeinheimerDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alan Arthur PetersDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mark Oliver WielpützDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas FrauenfelderDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hans-Ulrich KauczorDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claus Peter HeußelTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonas KroschkeDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. jonas.kroschke@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1225-3016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIncidentally detected pulmonary nodules present a challenge in clinical routine with demand for reliable support systems for risk classification. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the lung-cancer-prediction-convolutional-neural-network (LCP-CNN), a deep learning-based approach, in comparison to multiparametric statistical methods (Brock model and Lung-RADS®) for risk classification of nodules in cohorts with different risk profiles and underlying pulmonary diseases. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective analysis was conducted on non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT scans containing pulmonary nodules measuring 5-30 mm. Ground truth was defined by histology or follow-up stability. The final analysis was performed on 297 patients with 422 eligible nodules, of which 105 nodules were malignant. Classification performance of the LCP-CNN, Brock model, and Lung-RADS® was evaluated in terms of diagnostic accuracy measurements including ROC-analysis for different subcohorts (total, screening, emphysema, and interstitial lung disease).

resultsLCP-CNN demonstrated superior performance compared to the Brock model in total and screening cohorts (AUC 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96)). Superior sensitivity of LCP-CNN was demonstrated compared to the Brock model and Lung-RADS® in total, screening, and emphysema cohorts for a risk threshold of 5%. Superior sensitivity of LCP-CNN was also shown across all disease groups compared to the Brock model at a threshold of 65%, compared to Lung-RADS® sensitivity was better or equal. No significant differences in the performance of LCP-CNN were found between subcohorts.

conclusionThis study offers further evidence of the potential to integrate deep learning-based decision support systems into pulmonary nodule classification workflows, irrespective of the individual patient risk profile and underlying pulmonary disease. KEY POINTS: Question Is a deep-learning approach (LCP-CNN) superior to multiparametric models (Brock model, Lung-RADS®) in classifying pulmonary nodule risk across varied patient profiles? Findings LCP-CNN shows superior performance in risk classification of pulmonary nodules compared to multiparametric models with no significant impact on risk profiles and structural pulmonary diseases. Clinical relevance LCP-CNN offers efficiency and accuracy, addressing limitations of traditional models, such as variations in manual measurements or lack of patient data, while producing robust results. Such approaches may therefore impact clinical work by complementing or even replacing current approaches.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesSolitary Pulmonary NoduleTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentDecision supportEmphysemaInterstitial lung diseaseLung neoplasmRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID39747589
PMCPMC12165889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.