ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of epinephrine on neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest after automated external defibrillator use in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between endotracheal intubation and outcomes of nonshockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
OHCA (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest) patients have improved neurological outcomes with public-access automated external defibrillator (PAD) use. However, the benefit of epinephrine administration after PAD use remains controversial. The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of epinephrine administration on neurological outcomes in OHCA patients after PAD use. This study assessed 2,059,417 patients from the All-Japan Utstein Registry between 2005 and 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups: shockable and non-shockable rhythms on emergency medical service (EMS) arrival. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for various confounders and to analyze the impact of epinephrine administration on one-month favorable neurological outcomes. Criteria for bystander PAD was met by 11,629 (0.56%) of the enrolled patients. The mean age was 70 years with 71.9% male. Among them, 38.6% had shockable rhythms and 61.4% had non-shockable rhythms. After the matching, epinephrine administration negatively affected one-month favorable neurological outcome in patients with both shockable (14.7% vs. 41.1%, OR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.19-0.31) and non-shockable rhythms (3.6% vs. 10.8%, OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.23-0.42). These findings suggest that epinephrine administration did not improve neurological outcomes in patients with OHCA after PAD use, providing insights to optimize EMS protocols for OHCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.