ArticleScientific reports2025
Influence of prolong curing, freeze thaw cycles on strength and compaction condition on water retention behaviour of bamboo biochar amended soils.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Cement-Based Soil Stabilization Material: A Review of Biochar, Nanocellulose, and Recycled Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Powder Composite for Sustainable Geotechnics.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Harnessing biochar and plant growth-promoting bacteria for sustainable crop production under reclaimed water irrigation: A review.Journal of environmental qualityReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biochar has emerged as a promising soil amendment material, offering the potential to enhance mechanical and water retention properties. Geo-environmental structures constructed with biochar-amended soils (BAS) might experience a change in strength and water retention capacity due to extreme climactic changes, resulting in structural failures. The existing literature lacks a comprehensive study on the strength of BAS under prolonged curing, freeze-thaw cycles, and water retention behaviour for varying compaction conditions. The current study focused on addressing this research gap. Bamboo biochar (BB) was mixed with lean clay (CL) and silty sand (SM) in five different percentages (0%, 1%, 2%, 3.5% and 5% w/w) to prepare BAS specimens for unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and water retention tests. Results showed that UCS of CL soil increased up to 2% BB content but decreased thereafter, whereas it consistently decreased for SM soil with increasing BB content. Irrespective of the BB content, both soils consistently showed an increase in UCS with the curing period, which can be attributed to the enhanced bonding between the soil and BB, as well as the formation of stable aggregates. In contrast, the strength of both biochar-amended soils (BAS) decreased with the increase in freeze-thaw cycles, due to the expansion and contraction of ice within the specimen. The porous and hydrophilic nature of biochar (BB) increased the water retention capacity of both soils, with a more significant improvement observed in CL soil compared to SM soil, under both compacted and slurry conditions. Specimen compaction significantly decreased the gravimetric water content at the permanent wilting point in both soils. These variations were also evident in the microstructural analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.