Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747503›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Use of the Da Vinci SP surgical system in robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy: a single-center, retrospective study.

Sae Byul Lee, Jisun Kim, Il Yong Chung, Hee Jeong Kim, Jong Won Lee, Byung Ho Son, Beom Seok Ko

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Minimal-access nipple-sparing mastectomy: current evidence, limitations, and future evaluation.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sae Byul LeeDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Jisun KimDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Il Yong ChungDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Hee Jeong KimDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Jong Won LeeDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Byung Ho SonDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Beom Seok KoDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. spdoctorko@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the safety and performance of the Da Vinci SP single-port robot (SP robot) in nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate reconstruction. Medical records of 60 women aged ≥ 19 years who had undergone SP robot-assisted unilateral or bilateral NSM with immediate reconstruction between October 2020 and August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Stage I (31, 47.1%) was the most common pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage, followed by stages II (22, 33.3%), 0 (7, 10.6%), and III (4, 6.0%). The median total duration of NSM performed by a breast surgeon and reconstruction performed by a plastic surgeon was 154.0 min (interquartile range [IQR], 130.5-206.0 min) and 133.0 min (IQR, 80.0-255.0 min), respectively. The median length of hospitalization was 5.5 days (IQR, 3.0-9.0 days). Conversion to robotic multiport or open surgery was not required in any case. The median duration to drain removal was 5.0 days (IQR, 4.0-6.0 days). Recurrence of cancer within 6 months was not observed in any patient. SP robot-assisted NSM with immediate reconstruction was performed successfully in all patients without conversion to open surgery or the incidence of significant perioperative complications, indicating its precision and ability to minimize the size of the surgical incision.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNipplesRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerDa Vinci SPImmediate reconstructionNipple sparing mastectomyReconstructionRobot-assisted surgery

Identifiers

PMID39747503
PMCPMC11696119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.