Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Emergence of structures in neuronal network activities.

Olivier Darbin, Hamid R Eghbalnia, Andrew Romeo, Erwin B Montgomery

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olivier DarbinDepartment of Neurosurgery, University South Alabama, 307 University Blvd, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA. olivieredarbin@gmail.com.
Hamid R EghbalniaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
Andrew RomeoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University South Alabama, 307 University Blvd, Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Erwin B MontgomeryDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8L 2X2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear responses of individual neurons are both experimentally established and considered fundamental for the functioning of neuronal circuitry. Consequently, one may envisage the collective dynamics of large networks of neurons exhibiting a large repertoire of nonlinear behaviors. However, an ongoing and central challenge in the modeling of neural dynamics involves the trade-off between tractability and biological realism. This is particularly important in exploring the range of possible dynamics of large networks. Our approach uses Gaussian white noise as a probe, thus capturing the full range of system responses and characteristics by using an approach inspired by the well-established Wiener - Volterra nonlinear system identification approach. We assess model behavior over a range of network architectures and noise stimulation rates and demonstrate non-monotonicity and nonlinearity as a system property. Perhaps surprisingly, our computational model suggests that recurrent systems of nonlinear neurons exhibit a range of complex behaviors that do not readily yield to linear modeling in every setting. Our results suggest that a linear interpretation of experimental data is likely to discount the critical importance of properties emerging from network architecture. The main contribution of this effort is to highlight the importance of the network's architecture operating on the nonlinear properties of individual neurons and the experimental probing approaches of the circuitry.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNerve NetNeuronsAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansNonlinear DynamicsBasal GangliaComputational modelNeuronNonlinearSpike

Identifiers

PMID39747412
PMCPMC11696529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.