Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747380›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Learning to hear again with alternating cochlear frequency allocations.

Marc van Hoof, Lars Lambriks, Kiki van der Heijden, Joke Debruyne, Elke Devocht, Erwin George

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marc van HoofDepartment of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. marc.hoofvan@mumc.nl.
Lars LambriksDepartment of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kiki van der HeijdenDepartment of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Joke DebruyneDepartment of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Elke DevochtDepartment of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Erwin GeorgeDepartment of ENT/Audiology & School for Mental Health and NeuroScience (MHENS), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the place-pitch 'tonotopically' organized auditory neural pathway was considered to be hard-wired. Cochlear implants restore hearing by arbitrarily mapping frequency-amplitude information. This study shows that recipients, after a long period of sound deprivation, preserve a level of auditory plasticity, enabling them to swiftly and concurrently learn speech understanding with two alternating, distinct frequency maps. During rehabilitation, subjects switched maps randomly on a daily basis, serving as their own control. After stating their preference, on average, subjects maintained their hearing performance with the non-preferred, legacy map over time. In addition, subjects continued to learn and improve with their map of preference. Being able to train and process the auditory information from two maps did not seem to be a competition over neural resources, such as would be the case in a typical zero-sum game. This shows a new level of flexibility in learning and long-term adaptation of the auditory system. Practically, the required novel study design halves the sample size while mitigating order effects associated with neural plasticity, benefitting sensory-oriented trials.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedCochleaCochlear ImplantationFemaleHearingHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedNeuronal PlasticitySpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID39747380
PMCPMC11695609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.