Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747365›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Assessment of soil classification based on cone penetration test data for Kaifeng area using optimized support vector machine.

Hanliang Bian, Zhongxun Sun, Jiahan Bian, Zhaowei Qu, Jianwei Zhang, Xiangchun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hanliang BianSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Zhongxun SunSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Jiahan BianXiang Yang HangTai Power Machinery Plant, Xiangyang, 441002, China.
Zhaowei QuJiuzhou Engineering Design Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou, 451162, China.
Jianwei ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China.
Xiangchun XuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, China. xxc_geo@foxmail.com.

Funding

Science and Technology Department of Henan Province 225200810005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil classification and analysis are essential for understanding soil properties and serve as a foundation for various engineering projects. Traditional methods of soil classification rely heavily on costly and time-consuming laboratory and in-situ tests. In this study, Support Vector Machine (SVM) models were trained for soil classification using 649 Cone Penetration Test (CPT) datasets, specifically utilizing cone tip resistance ([Formula: see text]) and sleeve friction ([Formula: see text]) as input variables. Pearson correlation and sensitivity analysis confirmed that these variables are highly correlated with the classification results. To enhance classification performance, 25 optimization algorithms were applied, and the models were validated against an independent dataset of 208 CPT records. The results revealed that 23 of the algorithms successfully improved the SVM classification accuracy. Among these, 18 algorithms achieved higher accuracy than the current engineering standard, the "Code for in-situ Measurement of Railway Engineering Geology." Notably, the Thermal Exchange Optimization (TEO) algorithm resulted in the most significant improvement, increasing the accuracy of the original SVM model by 10% and exceeding the standard by 4.3%. Moreover, the models were thoroughly evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations, confusion matrices, ROC curves, and 10 key performance metrics. In conclusion, integrating evolutionary algorithms with SVM for soil classification offers a promising approach to enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of soil analysis in engineering applications.

Identifiers

PMID39747365
PMCPMC11696920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.