Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A lightweight weed detection model for cotton fields based on an improved YOLOv8n.

Jun Wang, Zhengyuan Qi, Yanlong Wang, Yanyang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Identification of leaves of wild Ussurian Pear (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jun WangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China. julianwong82@163.com.
Zhengyuan QiCollege of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Yanlong WangCollege of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Yanyang LiuCollege of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.

Funding

2024 Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development Special Project 24ZYQA023Gansu Province Top notch Leading Talent Project GSBJLJ-2023-09Gansu Provincial Department of Education Industry Support Plan Project 2022CYZC-41Support Fund for Young Graduate Guidance Teachers at Gansu Agricultural University GAU-QDFC-2022-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In modern agriculture, the proliferation of weeds in cotton fields poses a significant threat to the healthy growth and yield of crops. Therefore, efficient detection and control of cotton field weeds are of paramount importance. In recent years, deep learning models have shown great potential in the detection of cotton field weeds, achieving high-precision weed recognition. However, existing deep learning models, despite their high accuracy, often have complex computations and high resource consumption, making them difficult to apply in practical scenarios. To address this issue, developing efficient and lightweight detection methods for weed recognition in cotton fields is crucial for effective weed control. This study proposes the YOLO-Weed Nano algorithm based on the improved YOLOv8n model. First, the Depthwise Separable Convolution (DSC) structure is used to improve the HGNetV2 network, creating the DS_HGNetV2 network to replace the backbone of the YOLOv8n model. Secondly, the Bidirectional Feature Pyramid Network (BiFPN) is introduced to enhance the feature fusion layer, further optimizing the model's ability to recognize weed features in complex backgrounds. Finally, a lightweight detection head, LiteDetect, suitable for the BiFPN structure, is designed to streamline the model structure and reduce computational load. Experimental results show that compared to the original YOLOv8n model, YOLO-Weed Nano improves mAP by 1%, while reducing the number of parameters, computation, and weights by 63.8%, 42%, and 60.7%, respectively.

Indexed as

CottonDeep learningLightweight modelObject detectionWeed detectionYOLOv8

Identifiers

PMID39747358
PMCPMC11696358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.